The Mario Blog
02.15.2017—2am
Wanted: A Bring-Back-the-Copy Editors campaign

It was my blog post of last week that started it: dozens of emails from journalists around the world supporting my idea that we all need copy editors to read and to verify our stories.  Perhaps we need to organize a Bring Back the Copy Editors campaign

What started as a reaction to a New York Times public editor column by Liz Spayd, about the Times considering a reorganization where there would be fewer copy editors looking at reporters' copy, has developed in to a mini campaign to bring back those important, but usually invisible, titans of the newsroom: the ones who look at copy, fix spelling and grammar, question our facts, add numbers to make sure that they make sense, and play the role of readers before any readers get to see the text.

Why are copy editors disappearing, some of you ask me?

The good news is that they have not disappeared from everywhere totally, not yet, but the extinction of the copy editor is real and imminent. The reason? You guessed it. The economics of running newsrooms in the digital age, the loss of subscribers to print product, the delay of advertisers getting into the digital act.  We have all read stories of big media companies getting rid of hundreds of staffers (copy editors and photographers have been among the first to get pink slips).  

Then there are the so called “hubs” which are centralized operations for chains of newspapers to process copy and to design pages for a variety of newspapers in various geographic locations—leading to sometimes a lack of proper spelling for local streets and suburbs, since the person processing that police story for an Ohio daily may be  reading the copy in a hub in New Mexico.

What the mail brings

I appreciate your emails and comments via social media. Surprised that you don't leave your comments here.

The almost a dozen who have written all expressed one same theme: “What can we do to bring the presence of copy editors back into the newsroom and into our stories.?”

Perhaps it all begin with an honest conversation with your publisher and editor.  Nobody should think that because a newsroom has gone digital first it should also go clean copy last.

I acknowledge that we now have reporters who use the tools at their disposal, such as a smartphone, to take photos, to record videos and to file stories directly from the field. All of this is good and commendable, but no excuse for someone at the other end to take a look at the incoming material. In fact, because of the speed with which we can produce stories and post them, copy editing becomes a more vital task.

A couple of samples of the mail received;

Myles Dannhausen, Content Editor at the Peninsula Pulse,  a weekly newspaper in Door County, Wiswrites:

I write for a small Midwestern newspaper short on editing staff. I have many meaty stories I'd like to take on, but no editor to pick them apart, shape them, improve them. I'd like to budget a small amount each year to have an outside freelance editor work with me and other writers on particularly important stories. Any ideas of a services or people that might provide this?

I've worked with good editors at larger magazines and have seen how much it helps my work.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

David Cay Johnston, a Pulitzer Prize winner and recipient of IRE Medal and the George Polk Award, writes
                

I am all with you, but sadly we are in a minority among journalists.

When I won my Pulitzer the first people I thanked in my brief newsroom comments were the copy desk editors, followed by my boss and the top editors. This did not go down well, as I was told later, with the masthead….

David, who is also Editor & Founder, DCReport.org and a columnist for The Daily Beast, added:

Please keep finding ways to remind people of the value copy editors add.

And a self-confessed reader, who preferred his name not be used, wrote:

Is it possible that all the bias we see from the liberal media these days is nothing more than the result of very liberal journalists filing their own copy without anyone checking for truth, and/or for a balanced coverage where two sides of a story are presented?

A good question which, of course, applies equally to conservative writers who may push their agendas via their “objective” stories, without the copy editor as gatekeeper to keep things balanced in an ethical, professional way.

The topic is relevant and I am sure that it will get more traction in 2017 if we continue to hear from the President and his surrogates that the media is the opposition.  Could more copy editors make things better on that sticky point? I welcome your comments.

Why Everyone Needs an Editor

This is the official Inauguration portrait of President Donald J. Trump.

Wanted: correction, pronto.

TheMarioBlog post #2570

Blog Post04.22.2017—8am
The best designed newspapers in the world
Blog Post04.21.2017—1am
It’s Allium, Cyrus Highsmith’s new font creation
Blog Post04.20.2017—1am
For mobile ads, too, scrolling is the way to go
Blog Post04.19.2017—1am
NYT: Linear, visual storytelling at its best
Blog Post04.18.2017—1am
Gulf News: the evolution of sponsored content in Dubai
Blog Post04.12.2017—1am
Austria: The marketing of a newspaper
Blog Post04.11.2017—1am
NYT: What a difference a continent makes
Blog Post04.10.2017—1am
High school journalists’ investigative work produces results
Blog Post04.07.2017—1am
Some interesting weekend reads: innovation, new products, new numbers
Blog Post04.06.2017—1am
Print can be big, too
Blog Post04.05.2017—2am
The first Spanish-language newspaper for children is here
Blog Post04.04.2017—1am
Design thinking for journalists, why not?
Blog Post04.03.2017—2am
It’s a new look for the Las Vegas Review Journal
Blog Post03.31.2017—2am
Highlights of my webinar
Blog Post03.30.2017—7am
It’s the era of templates
Blog Post03.29.2017—1am
The role of print in my students’ lives
Blog Post03.28.2017—1am
Journalists and cocktail parties: not a happy mojito these days
Blog Post03.27.2017—1am
Financial Times: new look, new campaign (with readers as the main event)
Blog Post03.24.2017—2am
Mobile, news and Latin America: highlights of a conference
Blog Post03.23.2017—1am
For journalism students: learning about linear/visual storytelling
Blog Post03.22.2017—1am
Then we had 37 minutes to devote to print
Blog Post03.21.2017—1am
CNN Reliable Sources: the ultimate media briefing
Blog Post03.20.2017—1am
Netflix explores mobile-specific cuts of its series–and so should we
Blog Post03.17.2017—1am
These things caught my eye
Blog Post03.16.2017—1am
The Financial Times needs to make text type bigger
Blog Post03.15.2017—1am
Gulf News launches REACH by Gulf News
Blog Post03.14.2017—2am
Architectural Digest: Just call it AD
Blog Post03.13.2017—12am
Print to dust: The Tampa Tribune
Blog Post03.10.2017—2am
Wall Street Journal: “The Face of Real News”
Blog Post03.09.2017—2am
Inspiration is everywhere
Blog Post03.08.2017—2am
The new ad positions
Blog Post03.07.2017—2am
At The New York Times: when digital influences print
Blog Post03.06.2017—2am
Key centerpieces for discussion of media today
Blog Post03.03.2017—2am
It’s a new Type magazine
Blog Post03.02.2017—2am
Forget clicking, hello scrolling
Blog Post03.01.2017—2am
From Spain: a hard look at print and why it suffers
Blog Post02.28.2017—3am
Washington Post surprises with new slogan
Blog Post02.27.2017—2am
La La Land: the posters are winners, too
Blog Post02.21.2017—3am
In Dubai: Gulf News launches Sponsored Content
Blog Post02.20.2017—2am
Newsroom technology survey: important to participate
Contact us with speaking requests, questions or to discuss a project.