The Mario Blog
02.15.2017—2am
Wanted: A Bring-Back-the-Copy Editors campaign

It was my blog post of last week that started it: dozens of emails from journalists around the world supporting my idea that we all need copy editors to read and to verify our stories.  Perhaps we need to organize a Bring Back the Copy Editors campaign

What started as a reaction to a New York Times public editor column by Liz Spayd, about the Times considering a reorganization where there would be fewer copy editors looking at reporters' copy, has developed in to a mini campaign to bring back those important, but usually invisible, titans of the newsroom: the ones who look at copy, fix spelling and grammar, question our facts, add numbers to make sure that they make sense, and play the role of readers before any readers get to see the text.

Why are copy editors disappearing, some of you ask me?

The good news is that they have not disappeared from everywhere totally, not yet, but the extinction of the copy editor is real and imminent. The reason? You guessed it. The economics of running newsrooms in the digital age, the loss of subscribers to print product, the delay of advertisers getting into the digital act.  We have all read stories of big media companies getting rid of hundreds of staffers (copy editors and photographers have been among the first to get pink slips).  

Then there are the so called “hubs” which are centralized operations for chains of newspapers to process copy and to design pages for a variety of newspapers in various geographic locations—leading to sometimes a lack of proper spelling for local streets and suburbs, since the person processing that police story for an Ohio daily may be  reading the copy in a hub in New Mexico.

What the mail brings

I appreciate your emails and comments via social media. Surprised that you don't leave your comments here.

The almost a dozen who have written all expressed one same theme: “What can we do to bring the presence of copy editors back into the newsroom and into our stories.?”

Perhaps it all begin with an honest conversation with your publisher and editor.  Nobody should think that because a newsroom has gone digital first it should also go clean copy last.

I acknowledge that we now have reporters who use the tools at their disposal, such as a smartphone, to take photos, to record videos and to file stories directly from the field. All of this is good and commendable, but no excuse for someone at the other end to take a look at the incoming material. In fact, because of the speed with which we can produce stories and post them, copy editing becomes a more vital task.

A couple of samples of the mail received;

Myles Dannhausen, Content Editor at the Peninsula Pulse,  a weekly newspaper in Door County, Wiswrites:

I write for a small Midwestern newspaper short on editing staff. I have many meaty stories I'd like to take on, but no editor to pick them apart, shape them, improve them. I'd like to budget a small amount each year to have an outside freelance editor work with me and other writers on particularly important stories. Any ideas of a services or people that might provide this?

I've worked with good editors at larger magazines and have seen how much it helps my work.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

David Cay Johnston, a Pulitzer Prize winner and recipient of IRE Medal and the George Polk Award, writes
                

I am all with you, but sadly we are in a minority among journalists.

When I won my Pulitzer the first people I thanked in my brief newsroom comments were the copy desk editors, followed by my boss and the top editors. This did not go down well, as I was told later, with the masthead….

David, who is also Editor & Founder, DCReport.org and a columnist for The Daily Beast, added:

Please keep finding ways to remind people of the value copy editors add.

And a self-confessed reader, who preferred his name not be used, wrote:

Is it possible that all the bias we see from the liberal media these days is nothing more than the result of very liberal journalists filing their own copy without anyone checking for truth, and/or for a balanced coverage where two sides of a story are presented?

A good question which, of course, applies equally to conservative writers who may push their agendas via their “objective” stories, without the copy editor as gatekeeper to keep things balanced in an ethical, professional way.

The topic is relevant and I am sure that it will get more traction in 2017 if we continue to hear from the President and his surrogates that the media is the opposition.  Could more copy editors make things better on that sticky point? I welcome your comments.

Why Everyone Needs an Editor

This is the official Inauguration portrait of President Donald J. Trump.

Wanted: correction, pronto.

TheMarioBlog post #2570

Blog Post12.13.2017—1am
Best wishes for the holiday season!
Blog Post12.12.2017—1am
Every year should be year of the audience
Blog Post12.11.2017—1am
The Post Most: curated content as easy as 1-2-3
Blog Post12.08.2017—1am
The power of a comic
Blog Post12.07.2017—1am
Those European ePapers Continue Growing
Blog Post12.06.2017—1am
Journalism students and print (not a romance)
Blog Post12.05.2017—1am
The nuances of using ragged right type
Blog Post12.04.2017—1am
Monocle’s habit-forming daily briefing
Blog Post12.01.2017—1am
2018: More digital everything, more of the Trump factor
Blog Post11.30.2017—1am
That time of the year to think what next
Blog Post11.29.2017—1am
Apple goes romantic
Blog Post11.28.2017—1am
E-mail newsletters can be a real seductive hook
Blog Post11.27.2017—8am
An e-newsletter with visual appeal
Blog Post11.21.2017—1am
So 2017 was really NOT the year of video……
Blog Post11.20.2017—1am
The New York Times: the Spanish weekly
Blog Post11.17.2017—5am
Paywalls, storytelling highlight Latin American conference
Blog Post11.15.2017—5am
In Argentina: the hot topic is “paywalls”
Blog Post11.14.2017—1am
The NY Times’ Jobs Classified: Really?
Blog Post11.13.2017—1am
At The New York Times: a kids section on Sunday
Blog Post11.10.2017—12am
“I read it on Facebook.”
Blog Post11.09.2017—12am
The flow of a breaking new story in the mobile era
Blog Post11.08.2017—12am
When content hits the spot
Blog Post11.07.2017—12am
When hierarchy makes a statement
Blog Post11.06.2017—12am
When the advertising wraps around
Blog Post11.03.2017—1am
New Hebrew fonts from Typotheque
Blog Post11.02.2017—1am
Favorite branding logos? No surprises
Blog Post11.01.2017—7am
A New York terrorist attack on the front pages
Blog Post—1am
White (space) is the new trend for print
Blog Post10.31.2017—1am
Turkey: the jailing of an art director
Blog Post10.30.2017—1am
Need a job?
Blog Post10.27.2017—2am
The Economist & Snapchat Discover: Respecting young audiences
Blog Post10.26.2017—2am
The Wall: Get ready for the prototypes
Blog Post10.25.2017—5am
The New York Times’ website redesign: less is best and, please, sign in
Blog Post10.24.2017—5am
At The Washington Post, The Lily hits its own chords
Blog Post—5am
The Lily: new Washington Post product hits its own chords
Blog Post10.23.2017—1am
Coloring opinions
Blog Post10.20.2017—1am
Digital Media Conference: First Day highlights
Blog Post10.19.2017—6am
Speaking today at the North America Digital Media Conference
Blog Post10.18.2017—1am
Long narratives still have a coveted place
Blog Post10.17.2017—1am
Some good print-related news
Contact us with speaking requests, questions or to discuss a project.