The Mario Blog
01.23.2017—2am
The role of WED in creating a rich palette of visual storytelling for mobile

During our past three posts, we have concentrated on the applications of the WED (Writing/Editing/Design) philosophy to the way we tell stories visually for mobile devices in particular. Today we take a look at the most recent New York Times internal report and its call for more visual presentation of the news.

During our past three posts, we have concentrated on the applications of the WED (Writing/Editing/Design) philosophy to the way we tell stories visually for mobile devices in particular.

I have emphasized that, as a student of how stories are presented, and, specifically, the type of story structures that are created to present different stories, I admire the work currently carried out by The New York Times, where many stories are presented in a linear way, with a blending of narratives and imagery.

The New York Times internal report

The New York Times recently released its second internal report which makes it clear that, while much progress has been made in the way Times stories are told, it is not enough. The report, titled “Journalism That Stands Apart,” but often referred to as the 2020 report,

The report begins with “The New York Times has deftly adapted to the demands of digital journalism, but it needs to change even more quickly,”.

For visual storytellers, this report is inspiring and forward looking, with statements like this:

“Among the other recommendations in The Times’s report were reducing duplicative layers of article editing, and having visual experts play “the primary role covering some stories” — part of an urgent call for more visual journalism”

The report is introspective and brutally honest:

“The Times publishes about 200 pieces of journalism every day. This number typically includes some of the best work published anywhere. It also includes too many stories that lack significant impact or audience — that do not help make The Times a valuable destination.”

“The most poorly read stories, it turns out, are often the most “dutiful” — incremental pieces, typically with minimal added context, without visuals and largely undifferentiated from the competition. They frequently do not clear the bar of journalism worth paying for, because similar versions are available free elsewhere.”

A highlight of the report:

“The report needs to become more visual:The Times has an unparalleled reputation for excellence in visual journalism. We have defined multimedia storytelling for the news industry and established ourselves as the clear leader. Yet despite our excellence, not enough of our report uses digital storytelling tools that allow for richer and more engaging journalism. Too much of our daily report remains dominated by long strings of text.”

Why the NYT report is an eye opener, full of opportunities

“We also need to become more comfortable with our photographers, videographers and graphics editors playing the primary role covering some stories, rather than a secondary role. The excellent journalism already being produced by these desks serves as a model.

“Given our established excellence in this area, creating a more visual daily report is an enormous opportunity.”

 

The story structures of the digital age

The NYT report emphasizes that “we have dozens of regularly appearing features built for the print edition but not enough for a digital ecosystem. We need more journalistic forms that make The Times a habit by frequently enlightening readers on major running stories, through email newsletters, alerts, FAQs, scoreboards, audio, video and forms yet to be invented.”

I have outlined a few of those new story structures or forms that are particularly good examples of WED, where the fusion of writing/editing/design fits perfect to tell stories for mobile. Take a look.

A palette for visual storytelling

The following stories, all published by The New York Times, show us clear and easy to understand examples of combining narratives, good navigation and visuals.

Breaking News: What We Know/Don't Know

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/17/world/europe/tumult-in-turkey-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont-know.html

Breaking News: Live Analysis/Chat 
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/08/31/us/politics/trump-immigration-speech-live.html

Breaking News: Cinemagraphic Essay
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/16/world/middleeast/aleppo-evacuations-video.html

Quiz/Game
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/04/01/us/police-bodycam-video.html

Breaking News: Explainer

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/22/world/americas/trump-nuclear-tweet.html

Photo Story

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/27/world/middleeast/iraq-mosul-isis-car-bombs.html

Multimedia Story

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/06/22/world/americas/panama-canal.html

Previously and related

Visual storytelling via linear thinking:narrative of the story blends with the images accompanying it. http://www.garciamedia.com/blog/digital_storytelling_part_two_a_linear_fusion_of_narrative_imagery

Digital storytelling, Part One: The fusion of writing/editing/design
http://www.garciamedia.com/blog/digital_storytelling_part_one_the_fusion_of_writing_editing_design

Designers of all ages: Let’s rethink, reinvent and recharge
http://www.garciamedia.com/blog/designers_of_all_ages_lets_rethink_reinvent_and_recharge

TheMarioBlog post #2553

Blog Post11.21.2017—1am
So 2017 was really NOT the year of video……
Blog Post11.20.2017—1am
The New York Times: the Spanish weekly
Blog Post11.17.2017—5am
Paywalls, storytelling highlight Latin American conference
Blog Post11.15.2017—5am
In Argentina: the hot topic is “paywalls”
Blog Post11.14.2017—1am
The NY Times’ Jobs Classified: Really?
Blog Post11.13.2017—1am
At The New York Times: a kids section on Sunday
Blog Post11.10.2017—12am
“I read it on Facebook.”
Blog Post11.09.2017—12am
The flow of a breaking new story in the mobile era
Blog Post11.08.2017—12am
When content hits the spot
Blog Post11.07.2017—12am
When hierarchy makes a statement
Blog Post11.06.2017—12am
When the advertising wraps around
Blog Post11.03.2017—1am
New Hebrew fonts from Typotheque
Blog Post11.02.2017—1am
Favorite branding logos? No surprises
Blog Post11.01.2017—7am
A New York terrorist attack on the front pages
Blog Post—1am
White (space) is the new trend for print
Blog Post10.31.2017—1am
Turkey: the jailing of an art director
Blog Post10.30.2017—1am
Need a job?
Blog Post10.27.2017—2am
The Economist & Snapchat Discover: Respecting young audiences
Blog Post10.26.2017—2am
The Wall: Get ready for the prototypes
Blog Post10.25.2017—5am
The New York Times’ website redesign: less is best and, please, sign in
Blog Post10.24.2017—5am
At The Washington Post, The Lily hits its own chords
Blog Post—5am
The Lily: new Washington Post product hits its own chords
Blog Post10.23.2017—1am
Coloring opinions
Blog Post10.20.2017—1am
Digital Media Conference: First Day highlights
Blog Post10.19.2017—6am
Speaking today at the North America Digital Media Conference
Blog Post10.18.2017—1am
Long narratives still have a coveted place
Blog Post10.17.2017—1am
Some good print-related news
Blog Post10.16.2017—1am
Digital Transformation: no newsroom is too small to attempt it
Blog Post10.13.2017—12am
WAN IFRA: the best of digital awards
Blog Post10.12.2017—12am
Taking your brand to where the young audience is: Instagram
Blog Post10.11.2017—1am
Multitaskers consume more media
Blog Post10.10.2017—12am
Germany’s Sūdkurier: workshops for digital transformation
Blog Post10.09.2017—1am
In Spain’s El Mundo: native ads
Blog Post09.29.2017—1am
For newspaper publishers, not much to sing about?
Blog Post09.28.2017—1am
Interesting reference about new digital story formats
Blog Post09.27.2017—1am
It’s a new mobile-focused redesign for salon.com
Blog Post09.26.2017—1am
Three things that caught our eye
Blog Post09.25.2017—1am
Paywalls & newspapers: from leaky to hard ones, and in between
Blog Post09.22.2017—4am
Mexican earthquake: front pages tell the story
Blog Post09.21.2017—1am
Saying adios to The Village Voice in print
Contact us with speaking requests, questions or to discuss a project.