The Mario Blog
Paywalls & newspapers: from leaky to hard ones, and in between

It is one of the questions that confuses publishers, mystifies readers and leaves some in the audience quite upset when a wall comes down just at the time they are ready to read that interesting article. Paywalls get a good look over in a new Columbia Journalism Review study. Worth taking a look.

My workshop may be devoted to visual storytelling, but, regardless of topic, the first or second question following my presentation is always about paywalls. Three such questions:

Which newspaper that you know of have the best strategy for monetizing its operation via a paywall?

Can you cite a few strategies to monetize the operation via pay-as-you-read?

How many articles should a newspaper provide for free, before putting a wall and asking readers for their credit card information?

While paywalls for newspapers are not my area of expertise, I now found useful information in this new Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) research.

The CJR folks concluded that the majority of the US’s largest newspapers continue to employ digital subscription strategies that prioritize traffic, ad revenues, and promotion—despite the ongoing collapse of display ad rates.

Because the notion of paywalls doing the job seems to be different at various newspapers, the CJR study found that a full 10 sites, 40 percent of the outlets studied  looked at, focused on ad revenue exclusively, eschewing paywalls.

Two interesting highlights of the CJR study:

The paywalled news sites, 15 in total, diverged widely in the cost of their subscriptions, the number of free articles dispensed, the specific combination of “side door” exceptions employed, and whether they operated via one flagship website or two—one free and one for subscribers.

Even as they’ve added paying Web subscribers by the hundreds of thousands, daily newspapers have decisively rejected an all-in approach featuring “hard” website paywalls that mimic their print business models. Instead, most are employing either “leaky” paywalls with unlimited “side doors” for non-subscribers or no paywalls at all, according to a CJR analysis of the nation’s 25 most-visited daily newspaper sites.


Paywalls come in categories


And because we are in hurricane season and are quite familiarized with the various categories of hurricanes that describe their intensity and possible threat, I think it is safe to say, after reading the CJR conclusions, that “paywalls”, like hurricanes, also come in categories. Some barely make landfall.

-Hard Paywalls

There are the hard paywalls,  such as the one The Wall Street Journal employed until last year, with no metered articles or “side doors.” Exception: the Boston Globe comes closest. The paywall at was the only one  in the CJR study  that had no unlimited exceptions . Non-subscribers get ONLY two metered articles per month.

-Leaky Paywalls

There are the most abundantly found so called leaky paywalls:  with unlimited “side doors”: data gathering, promotion, and a continued central role in the public conversation. For more about “side doors” go here.

–The “very leaky” paywall

A handful of other publishers, including McClatchy and Gannett , are employing a paywall strategy at the opposite extreme to the Globe’s, leaving all three “side doors” open.

The two-website, “metered freemium” model

Also another category of paywalls is the “freemium” structure, which works in some ways like the “leaky” paywall, allowing the company to pursue both subscriptions and high traffic and ad revenue at the same time. This approach creates  two different experiences that target two distinct audiences, each with its own monetization model.

The no-paywall approach

A total of 10 of the 25 newspapers employed no paywall whatsoever, making all their content freely available online.


Optimism abounds

The CJR study concludes with rather optimistic statements, including this one from Mark Aldam, president Hearst Newspapers whose outlets employ “leaky” paywalls.


“The menu of paid experiences [online] will continue to expand. The possibility for success in the paid digital economy is on the rise.”

I say amen to that. I now have a better framework to answer those questions I face following my presentations. This CJR is must read for everyone in our business.


Digital Media North America



This two-day event, organized jointly by WAN-IFRA and the News Media Alliance (NMA), will provide a unique opportunity for North American news media executives to hear and discuss digital revenue strategyfrom the world’s most advanced media companies.

I will be one of the speakers for this conference in New York City.


Finalists in the Digital Media contest 2017



Mario’s Speaking Engagements

Oct. 19, WAN IFRA Digital Media North America, New York City

Nov. 16-19, WAN IFRA Latin America, Buenos Aires, Argentina



TheMarioBlog post #2705





Blog Post01.22.2018—1am
Are we using better photos today?
Blog Post01.19.2018—1am
The challenge of that fold
Blog Post01.18.2018—1am
The Washington Post: another profitable year
Blog Post01.17.2018—1am
Did I really read that much?
Blog Post01.15.2018—4am
The Guardian changes more than just the format
Blog Post—1am
Are vulgar words now part of a journalist’s styleguide?
Blog Post01.12.2018—4pm
The new New York Times campaign
Blog Post01.11.2018—1am
The good news about paying for content
Blog Post01.08.2018—3pm
Prof. Miguel Urabayen (1926-2018): Tribute to a grand maestro
Blog Post—2pm
Fire & Fury: Here’s a cover that tells more of the story
Blog Post—1am
End of print edition for Montreal’s La Presse
Blog Post01.07.2018—11am
Happy New Year…..I am back, sort of
Blog Post12.19.2017—10am
My prediction for 2018: we will write, edit & design for mobile
Blog Post12.13.2017—1am
Best wishes for the holiday season!
Blog Post12.12.2017—1am
Every year should be year of the audience
Blog Post12.11.2017—1am
The Post Most: curated content as easy as 1-2-3
Blog Post12.08.2017—1am
The power of a comic
Blog Post12.07.2017—1am
Those European ePapers Continue Growing
Blog Post12.06.2017—1am
Journalism students and print (not a romance)
Blog Post12.05.2017—1am
The nuances of using ragged right type
Blog Post12.04.2017—1am
Monocle’s habit-forming daily briefing
Blog Post12.01.2017—1am
2018: More digital everything, more of the Trump factor
Blog Post11.30.2017—1am
That time of the year to think what next
Blog Post11.29.2017—1am
Apple goes romantic
Blog Post11.28.2017—1am
E-mail newsletters can be a real seductive hook
Blog Post11.27.2017—8am
An e-newsletter with visual appeal
Blog Post11.21.2017—1am
So 2017 was really NOT the year of video……
Blog Post11.20.2017—1am
The New York Times: the Spanish weekly
Blog Post11.17.2017—5am
Paywalls, storytelling highlight Latin American conference
Blog Post11.15.2017—5am
In Argentina: the hot topic is “paywalls”
Blog Post11.14.2017—1am
The NY Times’ Jobs Classified: Really?
Blog Post11.13.2017—1am
At The New York Times: a kids section on Sunday
Blog Post11.10.2017—12am
“I read it on Facebook.”
Blog Post11.09.2017—12am
The flow of a breaking new story in the mobile era
Blog Post11.08.2017—12am
When content hits the spot
Blog Post11.07.2017—12am
When hierarchy makes a statement
Blog Post11.06.2017—12am
When the advertising wraps around
Blog Post11.03.2017—1am
New Hebrew fonts from Typotheque
Blog Post11.02.2017—1am
Favorite branding logos? No surprises
Blog Post11.01.2017—7am
A New York terrorist attack on the front pages
Contact us with speaking requests, questions or to discuss a project.