The Mario Blog
09.25.2017—1am
Paywalls & newspapers: from leaky to hard ones, and in between

It is one of the questions that confuses publishers, mystifies readers and leaves some in the audience quite upset when a wall comes down just at the time they are ready to read that interesting article. Paywalls get a good look over in a new Columbia Journalism Review study. Worth taking a look.

My workshop may be devoted to visual storytelling, but, regardless of topic, the first or second question following my presentation is always about paywalls. Three such questions:

Which newspaper that you know of have the best strategy for monetizing its operation via a paywall?

Can you cite a few strategies to monetize the operation via pay-as-you-read?

How many articles should a newspaper provide for free, before putting a wall and asking readers for their credit card information?

While paywalls for newspapers are not my area of expertise, I now found useful information in this new Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) research.

The CJR folks concluded that the majority of the US’s largest newspapers continue to employ digital subscription strategies that prioritize traffic, ad revenues, and promotion—despite the ongoing collapse of display ad rates.

Because the notion of paywalls doing the job seems to be different at various newspapers, the CJR study found that a full 10 sites, 40 percent of the outlets studied  looked at, focused on ad revenue exclusively, eschewing paywalls.

Two interesting highlights of the CJR study:

The paywalled news sites, 15 in total, diverged widely in the cost of their subscriptions, the number of free articles dispensed, the specific combination of “side door” exceptions employed, and whether they operated via one flagship website or two—one free and one for subscribers.

Even as they’ve added paying Web subscribers by the hundreds of thousands, daily newspapers have decisively rejected an all-in approach featuring “hard” website paywalls that mimic their print business models. Instead, most are employing either “leaky” paywalls with unlimited “side doors” for non-subscribers or no paywalls at all, according to a CJR analysis of the nation’s 25 most-visited daily newspaper sites.

 

Paywalls come in categories

 

And because we are in hurricane season and are quite familiarized with the various categories of hurricanes that describe their intensity and possible threat, I think it is safe to say, after reading the CJR conclusions, that “paywalls”, like hurricanes, also come in categories. Some barely make landfall.

-Hard Paywalls

There are the hard paywalls,  such as the one The Wall Street Journal employed until last year, with no metered articles or “side doors.” Exception: the Boston Globe comes closest. The paywall at BostonGlobe.com was the only one  in the CJR study  that had no unlimited exceptions . Non-subscribers get ONLY two metered articles per month.

-Leaky Paywalls

There are the most abundantly found so called leaky paywalls:  with unlimited “side doors”: data gathering, promotion, and a continued central role in the public conversation. For more about “side doors” go here.

–The “very leaky” paywall

A handful of other publishers, including McClatchy and Gannett , are employing a paywall strategy at the opposite extreme to the Globe’s, leaving all three “side doors” open.

The two-website, “metered freemium” model

Also another category of paywalls is the “freemium” structure, which works in some ways like the “leaky” paywall, allowing the company to pursue both subscriptions and high traffic and ad revenue at the same time. This approach creates  two different experiences that target two distinct audiences, each with its own monetization model.

The no-paywall approach

A total of 10 of the 25 newspapers employed no paywall whatsoever, making all their content freely available online.

 

Optimism abounds

The CJR study concludes with rather optimistic statements, including this one from Mark Aldam, president Hearst Newspapers whose outlets employ “leaky” paywalls.

 

“The menu of paid experiences [online] will continue to expand. The possibility for success in the paid digital economy is on the rise.”

I say amen to that. I now have a better framework to answer those questions I face following my presentations. This CJR is must read for everyone in our business.

 

Digital Media North America

http://events.wan-ifra.org/events/digital-media-north-america-2017

 

 

This two-day event, organized jointly by WAN-IFRA and the News Media Alliance (NMA), will provide a unique opportunity for North American news media executives to hear and discuss digital revenue strategyfrom the world’s most advanced media companies.

I will be one of the speakers for this conference in New York City.

 

Finalists in the Digital Media contest 2017

 

https://mailing.wan-ifra.org/vm.php?m=4769&u=ed7c3017381fb21f96ef5cf355e244e7

 

 

Mario’s Speaking Engagements

Oct. 19, WAN IFRA Digital Media North America, New York City

Nov. 16-19, WAN IFRA Latin America, Buenos Aires, Argentina

 

 

TheMarioBlog post #2705

 

 

 

 

Blog Post11.17.2017—5am
Paywalls, storytelling highlight Latin American conference
Blog Post11.15.2017—5am
In Argentina: the hot topic is “paywalls”
Blog Post11.14.2017—1am
The NY Times’ Jobs Classified: Really?
Blog Post11.13.2017—1am
At The New York Times: a kids section on Sunday
Blog Post11.10.2017—12am
“I read it on Facebook.”
Blog Post11.09.2017—12am
The flow of a breaking new story in the mobile era
Blog Post11.08.2017—12am
When content hits the spot
Blog Post11.07.2017—12am
When hierarchy makes a statement
Blog Post11.06.2017—12am
When the advertising wraps around
Blog Post11.03.2017—1am
New Hebrew fonts from Typotheque
Blog Post11.02.2017—1am
Favorite branding logos? No surprises
Blog Post11.01.2017—7am
A New York terrorist attack on the front pages
Blog Post—1am
White (space) is the new trend for print
Blog Post10.31.2017—1am
Turkey: the jailing of an art director
Blog Post10.30.2017—1am
Need a job?
Blog Post10.27.2017—2am
The Economist & Snapchat Discover: Respecting young audiences
Blog Post10.26.2017—2am
The Wall: Get ready for the prototypes
Blog Post10.25.2017—5am
The New York Times’ website redesign: less is best and, please, sign in
Blog Post10.24.2017—5am
At The Washington Post, The Lily hits its own chords
Blog Post—5am
The Lily: new Washington Post product hits its own chords
Blog Post10.23.2017—1am
Coloring opinions
Blog Post10.20.2017—1am
Digital Media Conference: First Day highlights
Blog Post10.19.2017—6am
Speaking today at the North America Digital Media Conference
Blog Post10.18.2017—1am
Long narratives still have a coveted place
Blog Post10.17.2017—1am
Some good print-related news
Blog Post10.16.2017—1am
Digital Transformation: no newsroom is too small to attempt it
Blog Post10.13.2017—12am
WAN IFRA: the best of digital awards
Blog Post10.12.2017—12am
Taking your brand to where the young audience is: Instagram
Blog Post10.11.2017—1am
Multitaskers consume more media
Blog Post10.10.2017—12am
Germany’s Sūdkurier: workshops for digital transformation
Blog Post10.09.2017—1am
In Spain’s El Mundo: native ads
Blog Post09.29.2017—1am
For newspaper publishers, not much to sing about?
Blog Post09.28.2017—1am
Interesting reference about new digital story formats
Blog Post09.27.2017—1am
It’s a new mobile-focused redesign for salon.com
Blog Post09.26.2017—1am
Three things that caught our eye
Blog Post09.25.2017—1am
Paywalls & newspapers: from leaky to hard ones, and in between
Blog Post09.22.2017—4am
Mexican earthquake: front pages tell the story
Blog Post09.21.2017—1am
Saying adios to The Village Voice in print
Blog Post09.20.2017—1am
Vogue in print: “point of view, attitude”
Blog Post09.19.2017—1am
The Boston Scene
Contact us with speaking requests, questions or to discuss a project.